Seems like it's WAD. ----- SMP/E development said this is unfortunately expected behavior.
There must be a DDDEF entry for each specified name. SMP/E does not check other sources (such as DD statements or GIMDDALC control statements in SMPPARM member GIMDDALC) to get the information needed to allocate the data sets. Mark Jacobs Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email. GPG Public Key - https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get&[email protected] ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Wednesday, March 24th, 2021 at 10:33 AM, Seymour J Metz <[email protected]> wrote: > Yikes! What priority did you assign? > > > -------------------------------------- > > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz > > http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [[email protected]] on behalf of > Mark Jacobs [[email protected]] > > Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2021 9:58 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [External] Re: SMP/e Dataset allocation question > > I opened up a ticket with support last night, we discussed the situation and > he's now taking with development. SMP/e CALLLIBS processing seems to require > a DDDEF and doesn't use anything allocated with a DD statement. > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
