> Thanks. Would that be?: > ... > 66 (X'42') 4 PMARL_DATE Date saved > 70 (X'46') 4 PMARL_TIME Time saved
Yes. That looks like it came from IGWPMDE; I have no idea what format the timestamp is. > IEBCOPY Unload/Load resets it to the reload time. BAD: it's not a bug, it's a feature. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [[email protected]] on behalf of Paul Gilmartin [[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, January 3, 2021 1:34 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Question About the Binder SETSSI statement On Sun, 3 Jan 2021 17:27:25 +0000, Seymour J Metz wrote: >I would guess that PDS86 uses DESERV with EXT_ATTR=YES. > Thanks. Would that be?: https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.2.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r2.idas300/s3254.htm ... 66 (X'42') 4 PMARL_DATE Date saved 70 (X'46') 4 PMARL_TIME Time saved I notice that NFS server returns time with sub-microsecond precision.' Possible if the (undocumented) byte field is binary, not display. I note also that HSM Migrate/Recall preserves the (FAMS?) timestamp; IEBCOPY Unload/Load resets it to the reload time. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
