I would like to issue IGGCSI00 and see how may datasets are involved doing it in multiple steps I would have to code 4,400 DD statements that would take forever
> On Oct 7, 2020, at 7:08 PM, Joseph Reichman <[email protected]> wrote: > > If DFSORT will do the trick I’m all for it > I have been looking at the manual > > I would assume it’s in the section running DFSORT from a program > > > >> On Oct 7, 2020, at 7:00 PM, Mike Hochee <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Joseph, >> >> I like your idea, especially if this is a one-off, you already have it >> written, and the system it's running on is not totally i/o or cpu >> constrained. If it becomes something that needs to run regularly, maybe >> that's a different story and you rewrite using DFSORT or whatever. >> >> HTH, >> Mike >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf Of Joseph Reichman >> Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2020 6:20 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: dataset allocation >> >> Caution! This message was sent from outside your organization. >> >> S322 >> >> I IMHO breaking up the job submitting to INTRDR may help >> >> What do you think ? >> >> >> >>>> On Oct 7, 2020, at 6:10 PM, Seymour J Metz <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Do you have TIME=1440 on both JOB and EXEC? What's the ABEND code? >>> >>> I'm in Annandale, just inside the Beltway. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz >>> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 >>> >>> >>> ________________________________________ >>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on >>> behalf of Joseph Reichman <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2020 4:01 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: dataset allocation >>> >>> 1440 it’s bombing on time >>> >>> Seymour you live in Virginia never worked for the IRS you cannt be >>> that far from NCFB the code here is all Assembler >>> >>> Large many VB files >>> >>> >>> >>>>> On Oct 7, 2020, at 2:52 PM, Seymour J Metz <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> The limit is the same for static and dynamic allocation. >>>> >>>> The limit is higher for extended TIOT. >>>> >>>> What TIME did you specify on JOB and EXEC? >>>> >>>> What DYNAMNBR did you specify on EXEC? >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz >>>> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 >>>> >>>> >>>> ________________________________________ >>>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on >>>> behalf of Joseph Reichman <[email protected]> >>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2020 1:28 PM >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: dataset allocation >>>> >>>> There are two main issues here >>>> >>>> 1) I can not allocate this many datasets to >>>> A job step that’s includes using SVC 99 >>>> >>>> 2) The job step times out because I have reached a 5 minute CPU time >>>> limit on the job step >>>> >>>> Sri from my understanding said DFSORT can overcome these two problems >>>> >>>> I’m looking at the DFSORT manual >>>> >>>> Thank You >>>> >>>>>>> On Oct 7, 2020, at 1:16 PM, Jeremy Nicoll >>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, 7 Oct 2020, at 18:06, Joseph Reichman wrote: >>>>>>> I work for the IRS I have to search thru year 2020 data that’s >>>>>>> 4,467 files about 240,000 records per file and a record length >>>>>>> could be >>>>>>> 10,000 bytes >>>>>>> VB files >>>>> >>>>> And you've said that multiple times. No-one cares who you work for, >>>>> but we do care about the technical issues you're facing. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Every single time you ask for help, no matter on what topic, it's >>>>> nearly impossible for anyone to find out what exactly you're trying to do. >>>>> >>>>> Why don't you just answer the questions? >>>>> >>>>> Are the records in the file in any particular order? >>>>> >>>>> Are you looking for particular values in fixed locations in the records? >>>>> >>>>> Are you looking for records where there's definable relationships >>>>> between values in specific records? >>>>> >>>>> Is there any way that - say - you can do a first scan to make >>>>> subsets of records before you then examine those in much more detail? >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Jeremy Nicoll - my opinions are my own. >>>>> >>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >>>>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO >>>>> IBM-MAIN >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> - For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >>>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO >>>> IBM-MAIN >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> - For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >>>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO >>>> IBM-MAIN >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send >>> email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >>> >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send >>> email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email >> to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
