If DFSORT will do the trick I’m all for it 
I have been looking at the manual 

I would assume it’s in the section running DFSORT from a program 



> On Oct 7, 2020, at 7:00 PM, Mike Hochee <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Joseph, 
> 
> I like your idea, especially if this is a one-off, you already have it 
> written, and the system it's running on is not totally i/o or cpu 
> constrained. If it becomes something that needs to run regularly, maybe 
> that's a different story and you rewrite using DFSORT or whatever. 
> 
> HTH, 
> Mike    
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of Joseph Reichman
> Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2020 6:20 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: dataset allocation
> 
> Caution! This message was sent from outside your organization.
> 
> S322
> 
> I IMHO breaking up the job submitting to INTRDR may help
> 
> What do you think ?
> 
> 
> 
>> On Oct 7, 2020, at 6:10 PM, Seymour J Metz <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Do you have TIME=1440 on both JOB and EXEC? What's the ABEND code?
>> 
>> I'm in Annandale, just inside the Beltway.
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
>> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>> 
>> 
>> ________________________________________
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on 
>> behalf of Joseph Reichman <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2020 4:01 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: dataset allocation
>> 
>> 1440 it’s bombing on time
>> 
>> Seymour you live in Virginia never worked for the IRS you cannt be 
>> that far from NCFB the code here is all Assembler
>> 
>> Large many VB files
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>>> On Oct 7, 2020, at 2:52 PM, Seymour J Metz <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> The limit is the same for static and dynamic allocation.
>>> 
>>> The limit is higher for extended TIOT.
>>> 
>>> What TIME did you specify on JOB and EXEC?
>>> 
>>> What DYNAMNBR did you specify on EXEC?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
>>> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on 
>>> behalf of Joseph Reichman <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2020 1:28 PM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: dataset allocation
>>> 
>>> There are two main issues here
>>> 
>>> 1) I can not allocate this many datasets to
>>>  A job step that’s includes using SVC 99
>>> 
>>> 2) The job step times out because I have reached a 5 minute CPU time 
>>> limit on the job step
>>> 
>>> Sri from my understanding said DFSORT can overcome these two problems
>>> 
>>> I’m looking at the DFSORT manual
>>> 
>>> Thank You
>>> 
>>>>>> On Oct 7, 2020, at 1:16 PM, Jeremy Nicoll 
>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Wed, 7 Oct 2020, at 18:06, Joseph Reichman wrote:
>>>>>> I work for the IRS I have to search thru year 2020 data that’s 
>>>>>> 4,467 files about 240,000 records per file and a record length 
>>>>>> could be
>>>>>> 10,000 bytes
>>>>>> VB files
>>>> 
>>>> And you've said that multiple times.  No-one cares who you work for, 
>>>> but we do care about the technical issues you're facing.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Every single time you ask for help, no matter on what topic, it's 
>>>> nearly impossible for anyone to find out what exactly you're trying to do.
>>>> 
>>>> Why don't you just answer the questions?
>>>> 
>>>> Are the records in the file in any particular order?
>>>> 
>>>> Are you looking for particular values in fixed locations in the records?
>>>> 
>>>> Are you looking for records where there's definable relationships 
>>>> between values in specific records?
>>>> 
>>>> Is there any way that - say - you can do a first scan to make 
>>>> subsets of records before you then examine those in much more detail?
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Jeremy Nicoll - my opinions are my own.
>>>> 
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, 
>>>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO 
>>>> IBM-MAIN
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> - For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, 
>>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO 
>>> IBM-MAIN
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> - For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, 
>>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO 
>>> IBM-MAIN
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send 
>> email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>> 
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send 
>> email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
> [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to