On Thu, 2 Jul 2020 08:40:23 -0700, Lizette Koehler wrote:
>Also review
>
>COPYGROUP
>COPYGRP
>
>They behave a little different
>
I recall this was discussed here several months ago.
IBM's design was irresponsible. The two terms are too easily
confused, particularly in oral communication between two
parties familiar respectively with one but not the other.
IBM should do the right thing: provide two new commands,
audibly distinct from COPYGRP, COPYGROUP, and each
other. Revise the documentation to:
COPYGRP: Obsolete; use xxxx instead.
COPYGROUP: Obsolete; use yyyy instead.
RFE?
IBM doesn't care.
-- gil
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
