In
<ofb720be09.00f392bb-on88257a90.005e7935-88257a90.00615...@sce.com>,
on 10/07/2012
at 10:43 AM, Skip Robinson <[email protected]> said:
>While Ed and I differ on the need for CHECK and on the practice of
>injecting maintenance directly into the body of a running system, we
>agree on the pointlessness of chasing down sysmod error chains.
There seems to be disagreement as to how to handle other types of
holds as well. In particular, I consider it risky to bypass action or
doc holds without first reading the comments in the hold or cover
letter.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
