In <[email protected]>, on
09/10/2012
at 03:19 PM, Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> said:
>On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 08:19:53 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: >
>>BTW, I saw a quote from an earlier message, but not the message
>>itself, talking about reading directory blocks from a PDSE. For the
>>record, those are not the actual PDSE directory blocks[1][2] but fake
>>blocks made to look like they came from a PDS; ise DESERV if you want
>>the actuial entries. And, yes, the TTR's are usable.
>>
>DESERV provides the CONN_INTENT=HOLD parameter to cause
>a held connection to the member. I assume this is implicit with
>BLDL. I doubt that this is supported for sequential reading of fake
>directory blocks. So while the TTRs are instantaneously usable, I
>suspect that any change such as replacing a member will make at least
>its TTR unusable.
In my message, "usable" referred to the TTR's returned by DESERV.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
