A weird way would be:
_OR OPSYN OR
OR OPSYN XR
OIL ...
OR OPSYN _OR
This "changes" the OR instruction in the OIL macro into an XR instruction. Of
course, this also ASSuMEs that OIL macro will never use more than one OR
instruction. If you want, you can copy the OIL macro to your own MACLIB and
change the name to XIL. Then physically change the OR instruction to XR in the
new XIL macro.
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets®
9151 Boulevard 26 . N. Richland Hills . TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone .
[email protected] . www.HealthMarkets.com
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message may contain confidential or
proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
HealthMarkets® is the brand name for products underwritten and issued by the
insurance subsidiaries of HealthMarkets, Inc. -The Chesapeake Life Insurance
Company®, Mid-West National Life Insurance Company of TennesseeSM and The MEGA
Life and Health Insurance Company.SM
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David Crayford
> Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 9:12 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Why ain't there no XILL?
>
> On 2/08/2012 9:46 PM, Wayne Driscoll wrote:
> > I would assume the pother is because OIL and NIL are macros
> that provide
> > or and and processing with serialization. Your notation
> fails to provide
> > serialization. It should be relatively easy to create an
> XIL macro based
> > on OIL or NIL however.
>
> Please show us how to then!
>
> > ===============================================
> > Wayne Driscoll
> > OMEGAMON DB2 L3 Support/Development
> > wdrisco(AT)us.ibm.com
> > ===============================================
> >
> >
> >
> > From: John Gilmore <[email protected]>
> > To: [email protected],
> > Date: 08/02/2012 07:12 AM
> > Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] Why ain't there no XILL?
> > Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> <[email protected]>
> >
> >
> >
> > Any standard logic text establishes that
> >
> > o AND, inclusive OR, and NOT are together universal,
> >
> > o NOR alone is universal, and
> >
> > o NAND alone is universal.
> >
> > Thus, in an obvious notation,
> >
> > XOR(a,b) =df (a | b) & (¬(a & b))
> >
> > What is all the pother about?
> >
> >
> > John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
> >
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to [email protected] with the message:
> INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to [email protected] with the message:
> INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
