On 2/08/2012 9:46 PM, Wayne Driscoll wrote:
I would assume the pother is because OIL and NIL are macros that provide or and and processing with serialization. Your notation fails to provide serialization. It should be relatively easy to create an XIL macro based on OIL or NIL however.
Please show us how to then!
=============================================== Wayne Driscoll OMEGAMON DB2 L3 Support/Development wdrisco(AT)us.ibm.com =============================================== From: John Gilmore <[email protected]> To: [email protected], Date: 08/02/2012 07:12 AM Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] Why ain't there no XILL? Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> Any standard logic text establishes that o AND, inclusive OR, and NOT are together universal, o NOR alone is universal, and o NAND alone is universal. Thus, in an obvious notation, XOR(a,b) =df (a | b) & (¬(a & b)) What is all the pother about? John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
