In <[email protected]>, on
06/06/2012
at 10:12 AM, Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> said:
>Was this truly the intent of the design, or did it just happen to
>work that way, so they documented it as a feature?
That would be my guess. Then they added the message instead of fixing
it. Has anybody submitted a requirement to actually fix it?
>Does this imply that I can't code two separate DD statements, each
>containing the "DDNAME=..." option in the same PROC, where they
>refer to separate concatenations, respectively?
No, it implies that you can't even code *one* DD statement containing
the "DDNAME=..." option to refer to a concatenation; one, two or many,
they refer to individual DD statements, not to concatenations. Whacko?
Yes, but no more so that absolute track 0 not available when you omit
SPACE=.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
