In <[email protected]>, on
06/05/2012
at 03:56 PM, "Staller, Allan" <[email protected]> said:
>Nothing in the provided example would cause the SHOWIT proc to be
>displayed.
Wrong; in the example, the first statement following the proc
invocation is the DD statement swallowed by the DDNAME= and the next
statement is a DD with a blank ddname.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
