[email protected] (Phil Smith) writes: > And the VM/XA SPOOL system in general was super-robust - I wrote a > system mod (product) that tinkered with SPOOL, and while I created > SPOOL files that couldn't be seen, and couldn't be opened, and > couldn't be purged by normal means, I *never* took out the rest of > SPOOL. Really nice stuff. Especially after the HPO 5 debacle!
re: http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2012g.html#17 Co-existance of z/OS and z/VM on same DASD farm http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2012g.html#19 Co-existance of z/OS and z/VM on same DASD farm 40th vm370 anniv. this year ... 2012 vm workshop discussion in (linkedin) z/VM http://lnkd.in/Emfz8Z some also archived here http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2012g.html#18 and http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2012g.html#23 I posted schedule for 1987 vm workshop ... mentions I gave two presentations (on performance and networking) and two BOFs (debugging and spool file system rewrite). The spool file system rewrite was because I needed at least a factor of 100 times increase in thruput (for RSCS network thruput). I also made the integrity of the spool file system and the integrity of the overall system completely independent (like I could loose whole spool file disk w/o impacting the running of the system and/or the integrity of the spool files on other disks). -- virtualization experience starting Jan1968, online at home since Mar1970 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
