Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>So, who won?  It doesn't sound as if the climate would admit a compromise?

VM/XA MA begat VM/XA SF begat VM/XA SP, which eventually moved to Endicott, and 
became VM/ESA and then z/VM. The core of VM/XA was actually much better than 
VM/SP; as a developer I found it much easier to work with.

>The memories fade, but VM/XA as it was shipped impressed me favorably.  One 
>thing I remember is that CP QUERY would tell the size of a spool file _before_ 
>it was closed.  Revolutionary! And invaluable to operators trying to identify 
>the runaway VM.

And the VM/XA SPOOL system in general was super-robust - I wrote a system mod 
(product) that tinkered with SPOOL, and while I created SPOOL files that 
couldn't be seen, and couldn't be opened, and couldn't be purged by  normal 
means, I *never* took out the rest of SPOOL. Really nice stuff. Especially 
after the HPO 5 debacle!

...phsiii

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to