I'll bite. Hi, Walt, What makes you think IBM might listen to this now that you are not there? These jobs have always been a mess.
Last time I ranted, I suggested that serverpac provide an unload (or unload records of the required profiles that could be used with DBSYNC (A very useful tool, thank you so much) to more closely approximate the updates needed to a customer specific RACF DB. I think Russ, or someone took the idea under advisement. Dave Gibney Information Technology Services Washington State University > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Walt Farrell > Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 11:32 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: ServerPac RACF* jobs (rant) > > On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:57:52 +0200, R.S. > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >RACFDRV and RACFTGT jobs are part of ServerPac installation process. > >I have the following observation: the jobs are longer and longer and > >MUCH MORE STUPID. > >Example: > >...snipped... > >BTW: I corrected (you can call it: edited) RACFDRV. Original size: 1500 > >lines, size after corrections: 137 lines (including comments), almost no > >line left untouched. > >Now I'm editing RACFTGT. 4300+ lines, I edited maybe 50%, 1600 lines left. > > > >I think this should be seriously improved. > > > > > >Time for my pills > > Perhaps better, time for you to open a PMR with the IBM Support Center > (directed to ServerPac, of course, not RACF) so they can improve things. > > -- > Walt > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
