On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 10:16:32 -0700, Dick Bond wrote: >I agree with Chris Mason. IBM should have never started called it USS - >how about a simple definitive abbreviation, like "zUnix". IBM adores >putting a "z" in front of everything (for some clueless reason) so why >should their version of Unix be any different? > Sigh. That would be at hazard for branding changes, complicating archive searches, etc.
Is it free of trademark encumbrances? Would it be reasonably unambiguous in WWW searches (unlike zFS vis-à-vis ZFS)? (What do people use nowadays as a keyword for that product?) -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
