"Paul Gilmartin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:<[email protected]>...
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 10:26:33 -0400, Gerhard Postpischil wrote:
> >
> >there is one case that I have not seen mentioned - in the dark
> >ages, under release 21 of OS/360(MVT), IEFBR14 steps on our
> >system abended with S322. I had to write a special exception
> >into IEFUTL to allow allocation to complete.
> > 
> I'm curious.  You must have investigated.  Is the ABEND
> 
> o Because of something IEFBR14 did?
> 
> o Because of something IEFBR14 didn't do?
> 
> o Because of some unwarranted assumption made by "[your]
>   system"?
> 
> o Was there a divide-by-zero error involved?
> 
> -- gil
> 

Investigation is simple, even after so many years:

322

                                                                        
Explanation:     One of the following occurred:

                                                                        
~   The system took a longer time to run a job, job step, or procedure

    than the time specified in one of the following:

                                                                        
    -   The TIME parameter of the EXEC or JOB statement

                                                                        
    -   The standard time limit specified in the job entry subsystem

                                                                        
Given enough dd statements, on a slow processor, it will take enough
time to exceed a small standard time limit.

Kees.
********************************************************
For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286
********************************************************
                        

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to