On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 05:53:14 -0600, Jan MOEYERSONS wrote: > > >On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:45:11 +0000, Rob Scott wrote: > > > >>Obviously this assumes you know the UTC offset at the time of the LPAR > >> > >And that is exactly where it hurts... How does one know what the offset > was at the time the timestamp was taken? Due to daylight saving, it is far > from obvious to determine the offset at any given moment in the past. > > > But the work has been done: > > http://www.iana.org/time-zones > > > On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 07:05:04 -0600, Shane Ginnane wrote: > > > >Yep, it's called TZDATA. Pity IBM hasn't gotten sufficiently organized to > embrace it for z/OS > >Damn, I guess that places me alongside gil/John. Thus a (nominal) > triumvirate - perchance to progress to a fully populated cabal someday ? > > > In fact, on this topic, both Johns. We lack only one of a quorum. > But would that be as effective as a minyan? > -- gil > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
