On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 05:53:14 -0600, Jan MOEYERSONS wrote:
>On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:45:11 +0000, Rob Scott wrote:
>
>>Obviously this assumes you know the UTC offset at the time of the LPAR
>>
>And that is exactly where it hurts... How does one know what the offset was at
>the time the timestamp was taken? Due to daylight saving, it is far from
>obvious to determine the offset at any given moment in the past.
>
But the work has been done:
http://www.iana.org/time-zones
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 07:05:04 -0600, Shane Ginnane wrote:
>
>Yep, it's called TZDATA. Pity IBM hasn't gotten sufficiently organized to
>embrace it for z/OS
>Damn, I guess that places me alongside gil/John. Thus a (nominal) triumvirate
>- perchance to progress to a fully populated cabal someday ?
>
In fact, on this topic, both Johns. We lack only one of a quorum.
-- gil
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
