On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 21:38:15 -0500, Chris Mason <[email protected]> wrote:
>Matan has asked VTAM questions in the not too distant past in case you didn't >know which was a further factor in wanting to point out how this misuse wasted >my time and that of anyone else who might have more of an interest in >Communications Server (CS). Once these novices have started to specialise in >supporting CS they may well be joining me in getting upset by diving into >posts - or just being alerted by these false subject lines - which are not >what they might be. Which pales in comparison to the time wasted responding at length to it each and every time it happens... For former novices, once specialized, might I suggest IBMTCP-L (or whatever list exists for SNA)? Kills several pigeons with one cat, methinks. Old habits die hard. Even IBM still disclaims the completeness of their corrections to "errant" references in their products and documentation. Cut some slack. Let it go once in a while. Or at least take it up with the "offenders offline" (we don't all need to repeat the lesson). Regards, Art Gutowski ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
