>That's the null set. Gee, I don't think you should call Mr. Mason a null. If he's not complaining, he's doing a pretty good approximation.
>But there *is* the group of those who reply solely to complain about a >correction. Who, besides you and he, believes it's a correction? IBM uses it -- they introduced me to the term almost 15 years ago. Also, where do you get the temerity to do the 'corrrection'? Do you represent IBM in any (legal) way? Or, are you just a self-appointed evangelist? I complain about the 'correction' because it's a dead horse you two keep flogging. Since you two aren't listening to the fact that, except for the useless chatter from you two and the deliberately misleading post(s), we don't care! I, for one, shall continue to 'misuse' the TLA. And, since I have already put both of you on my kill list a long time ago, I shall only be seeing any posts indirectly, by others quoting you. So, most of the time, I won't have to exercise the delete key. But, I shall not be responding to any more bump on USS. The world will continue to spin and the sun to shine, while I blithely tool along in my 'arrogance'. But, none are so arrogant as those who continue to 'correct' those who do not wish it, and said 'correctors' have no valid authority. - Ted MacNEIL [email protected] Twitter: @TedMacNEIL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
