Dave
I've repeated an example of why it matters to Don Grinsell.
I thought it might be interesting to dig out another case. In fact, I see now
it's the same person still bemused by hearing the misuse so often and getting
confused in a way other than that other example:
<quote>
I have the following entry in my USSTAB:
P39TMMVS USSCMD CMD=P39TMMVS,REP=LOGON,FORMAT=BAL
USSPARM PARM=APPLID,DEFAULT=TMONMVS
When I key in P39TMMVS we are really getting TMONMVS as the executable.
What I don't understand is what path is followed to execute TMONMVS?
</quote>
http://alabamamaps.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0902&L=ibm-
main&T=0&F=&S=&P=53610
Chris Mason
On Mon, 2 May 2011 16:51:44 -0700, Gibney, Dave <[email protected]>
wrote:
>Amen, can you say AAAMeennn
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On
>> Behalf Of Scott Rowe
>> Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 2:42 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: USS vs USS
>>
>> Ed,
>>
>> That has to be the most sensible post of this entire idiotic
>kerfuffle.
>>
>> I owe you a beer if I ever make it to SCIDS again.
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Edward Jaffe
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>> > On 5/2/2011 8:44 AM, Ed Gould wrote:
>> >
>> >> I suggest a SHARE requirement to get IBM to decide once and for all
>> of a
>> >> definition for USS.
>> >>
>> >
>> > I would like to know which use is the most offensive to the largest
>> number
>> > of people. That's the one I will start using most.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Edward E Jaffe
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
