> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of R.S.
>
> W dniu 2011-04-28 14:39, Staller, Allan pisze:
> > It is not necessary to create a DDDEF for SMPPTS1, .....
> >
> > You already have a DDDEF for SMPPTS. The code will automatically look for
> > SMPPTS1, SMPPTS2,.......
> > All you have to do is provide JCL that points to the additional data set
>
> Do you mean DD statements? Well, DDDEFs are created to avoid providing
> tons of DD names for GIMSMP. So in this case DD name is replacement for
> DDDEF. Rhetorical queston: is it better to provide additional DD names
> in all SMPE jobs or define DDDEFs once?
We added DDDEFs.
"Simpler".
-jc-
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
