ROTFLMAO! They thing demand paging will be faster than CFW to SORTWK? Oh the
pain...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of
> Mike Schwab
> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 1:41 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] Region size
> 
> I have some users who requested 150GB of Paging packs so they could do
> an in core reorg of multiple M9 volume DB2 databases, because that was
> the fastest way.  I told them that was too much and they needed to
> specify sort work statements.  They resisted and the request is
> pending.
> 
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Mark Pace <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I assume that since it used 1792MB it has to be from above the line.
> >
> > There is not a dump.  The program ends nicely with an error message, not
an
> > IBM message, that it is out of memory.
> >
> > It's batch utility to massage SMF data and was not written inhouse.  The
SE
> > is talking with them now.  There suggestion was to process less data.
:-D
> >
> > The LPAR is 4GB and I really don't know how much is to much.
> >
> > I don't have a default region size, that I know of.  I allow the use of
> > REGION=0M and don't have any exit to limit that size.
> --
> Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
> Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
> Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to