On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Darth Keller <[email protected]> wrote:
> We've recently installed an HDS MDL.  In the course of the installation,
> we decided we wanted to stage things so that down the road we can do
> remote replication of tape.  Basically we don't intend to replicate the
> entire library - we'll replicate tapes which have been identified as
> needing off-site vaulting.  We've done this by implementing CA1
> sub-pooling which allows us to direct a sub-set of datasets to a specific
> range of tape volsers.  The volser's to be vaulted all start with the
> first character of 'V" and the sub-pool is named "DRVAULT".
>
> The intention is that down the road at some point, we'll have another MDL
> at a remote site and we'll use 'magic' HDS functionality to replicate the
> "V" volumes to the remote MDL.
>
> This has been running successfully since late July.  However, we've
> recently had 2 different jobs abend because it appears that CA1 is calling
> for a tape from the wrong aub-pool.  The job is re-submitted approx. 15
> minutes later and runs successfully - no changes to the job, no changes to
> the CA1 NSM table, no changes to the MDL in the 15 minute interval.
>
> This is what the messages look like when it runs successfully:
>
> *IEC501A M 841C,PRIVAT,SL,COMP,jobname,
> *TMS002  IEC501A M 841C,DRVAULT,SL,COMP
>  IECTMS9 841C,V95538,jobname,OUTFILE ,
>
>
> The is the sequence of messages when it runs amok:
>
> *IEC501A M 8401,PRIVAT,SL,COMP,jobname,
> *TMS001  IEC501A M 8401,PRIVAT,SL,COMP,jobname,
>  IECTMS3 8401,M33439,IS NOT SCRTCH (80)
>  IEC518I SOFTWARE ERRSTAT: REJTMS   8401,M33439,SL,jobname,
>
> So we opened an issue with CA1 & got the following response:
>   "Since you have this defined as a manual tape library subpooling is not
> supported.  CA1 subpooling is NOT supported with IBM SMS-managed tape
> libraries (ATL or
> MTL)."
>
> I find this response interesting as I'm not seeing how an SMS Library
> comes into play in this case -  the library is actually returning a
> scratch tape from the pool CA1 is requesting - for some reason, it appears
> to me that CA1 is sometimes requesting the wrong sub-pool.
>
> So my question is anyone else using CA1 sub-pooling and SMS-managed tape
> libraries?
> thanks - dd keller

Our site used to get this too, assigning volumes from the wrong pool.
Immediately after you get the error message see how many scratch tapes
you have and how many in the various sub pools.  You might be running
faster than the VTS is scratching tapes.

-- 
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to