On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 17:41:49 -0600, Mark Zelden wrote:
>
>Based on a quick test of SLEEP from TSO without rc=syscalls('ON'), it looks
>like it isn't required. Maybe since z/OS 1.8.
>
I assume you mean "sleep 0". Fortunately that doesn't mean
"sleep forever", as some languages quirkily treat null constructs.
Every language needs a couple things:
o A no-op (IEFBR14, /bin/true, whatever)
o A lexical convention for comments.
>---- ------ ------- -------- ------
>$P1 MG06358 HTE7730 050930 WSY1: Added the SYSCALL
> host environment to the SUBCOM table in support
> of USS REXX. Added the EZAFTPKR function package
> to the system package tables in support of the
> FTPAPI function.
>
Yaaay!. But only half; see my previous ply. Now what we
need is "address SH". I'd gladly accept the return of
SYSCALLS('ON') (I never even missed it) if it enabled SH.
-- gil
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
