i18n-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: JDK-8255262: Remove use of legacy custom @spec tag Lance Andersen
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: JDK-8255262: Remove use of legacy custom @spec tag Mark Reinhold
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: JDK-8255262: Remove use of legacy custom @spec tag Alan Bateman
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: JDK-8255262: Remove use of legacy custom @spec tag Joe Darcy
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: JDK-8255262: Remove use of legacy custom @spec tag Iris Clark
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: JDK-8255262: Remove use of legacy custom @spec tag Mandy Chung
  • <i18n dev> Integrated: JDK-8255262: Remove use of legacy custom @spec tag Jonathan Gibbons
• <i18n dev> RFR: 8255086: JRE country and region name may be the latest Naoto Sato
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8255086: JRE country and region name may be the latest Brent Christian
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8255086: Update the root locale display names Naoto Sato
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8255086: Update the root locale display names Brent Christian
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8255086: Update the root locale display names [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8255086: Update the root locale display names [v2] Brent Christian
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8255086: Update the root locale display names [v2] Joe Wang
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8255086: Update the root locale display names [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8255086: Update the root locale display names [v2] Joe Wang
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8255086: Update the root locale display names [v2] Joe Wang
  • <i18n dev> Integrated: 8255086: Update the root locale display names Naoto Sato
• <i18n dev> RFR: 8254982: (tz) Upgrade time-zone data to tzdata2020c Kiran Sidhartha Ravikumar
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8254982: (tz) Upgrade time-zone data to tzdata2020c Erik Joelsson
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8254982: (tz) Upgrade time-zone data to tzdata2020c Naoto Sato
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8254982: (tz) Upgrade time-zone data to tzdata2020c [v2] Kiran Sidhartha Ravikumar
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8254982: (tz) Upgrade time-zone data to tzdata2020c [v2] Kiran Sidhartha Ravikumar
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8254982: (tz) Upgrade time-zone data to tzdata2020c [v2] Naoto Sato
  • <i18n dev> Integrated: 8254982: (tz) Upgrade time-zone data to tzdata2020c Kiran Sidhartha Ravikumar
• <i18n dev> RFR: 8254177: (tz) Upgrade time-zone data to tzdata2020b Kiran Sidhartha Ravikumar
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8254177: (tz) Upgrade time-zone data to tzdata2020b Kiran Sidhartha Ravikumar
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8254177: (tz) Upgrade time-zone data to tzdata2020b Erik Joelsson
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8254177: (tz) Upgrade time-zone data to tzdata2020b Naoto Sato
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8254177: (tz) Upgrade time-zone data to tzdata2020b Sean Coffey
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8254177: (tz) Upgrade time-zone data to tzdata2020b Kiran Sidhartha Ravikumar
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8254177: (tz) Upgrade time-zone data to tzdata2020b Andrew John Hughes
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8254177: (tz) Upgrade time-zone data to tzdata2020b Kiran Sidhartha Ravikumar
  • <i18n dev> Integrated: 8254177: (tz) Upgrade time-zone data to tzdata2020b Kiran Sidhartha Ravikumar
• <i18n dev> RFR: 8253459: Formatter treats index, width and precision > Integer.MAX_VALUE incorrectly Ian Graves
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253459: Formatter treats index, width and precision > Integer.MAX_VALUE incorrectly Roger Riggs
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253459: Formatter treats index, width and precision > Integer.MAX_VALUE incorrectly Ian Graves
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253459: Formatter treats index, width and precision > Integer.MAX_VALUE incorrectly [v7] Ian Graves
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253459: Formatter treats index, width and precision > Integer.MAX_VALUE incorrectly [v2] Ian Graves
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253459: Formatter treats index, width and precision > Integer.MAX_VALUE incorrectly [v3] Ian Graves
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253459: Formatter treats index, width and precision > Integer.MAX_VALUE incorrectly [v4] Ian Graves
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253459: Formatter treats index, width and precision > Integer.MAX_VALUE incorrectly [v4] Jason Mehrens
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253459: Formatter treats index, width and precision > Integer.MAX_VALUE incorrectly [v5] Ian Graves
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253459: Formatter treats index, width and precision > Integer.MAX_VALUE incorrectly [v5] Marcono1234
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253459: Formatter treats index, width and precision > Integer.MAX_VALUE incorrectly [v6] Ian Graves
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253459: Formatter treats index, width and precision > Integer.MAX_VALUE incorrectly [v7] Ian Graves
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253459: Formatter treats index, width and precision > Integer.MAX_VALUE incorrectly [v8] Ian Graves
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253459: Formatter treats index, width and precision > Integer.MAX_VALUE incorrectly [v9] Ian Graves
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253459: Formatter treats index, width and precision > Integer.MAX_VALUE incorrectly [v9] Roger Riggs
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253459: Formatter treats index, width and precision > Integer.MAX_VALUE incorrectly [v9] Stuart Marks
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253459: Formatter treats index, width and precision > Integer.MAX_VALUE incorrectly [v10] Ian Graves
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253459: Formatter treats index, width and precision > Integer.MAX_VALUE incorrectly [v11] Ian Graves
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253459: Formatter treats index, width and precision > Integer.MAX_VALUE incorrectly [v11] Roger Riggs
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253459: Formatter treats index, width and precision > Integer.MAX_VALUE incorrectly [v11] Ian Graves
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253459: Formatter treats index, width and precision > Integer.MAX_VALUE incorrectly [v12] Ian Graves
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253459: Formatter treats index, width and precision > Integer.MAX_VALUE incorrectly [v12] Roger Riggs
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253459: Formatter treats index, width and precision > Integer.MAX_VALUE incorrectly [v12] Stuart Marks
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253459: Formatter treats index, width and precision > Integer.MAX_VALUE incorrectly [v12] Ian Graves
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253459: Formatter treats index, width and precision > Integer.MAX_VALUE incorrectly [v13] Ian Graves
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253459: Formatter treats index, width and precision > Integer.MAX_VALUE incorrectly [v13] Stuart Marks
  • <i18n dev> Integrated: 8253459: Formatter treats index, width and precision > Integer.MAX_VALUE incorrectly Ian Graves
• <i18n dev> RFR: 8251989: Hex formatting and parsing utility Roger Riggs
• <i18n dev> RFR: 8251123: doclint warnings about missing javadoc tags and comments Sergey Bylokhov
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8251123: doclint warnings about missing javadoc tags and comments Jayathirth D V
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8251123: doclint warnings about missing javadoc tags and comments Sergey Bylokhov
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8251123: doclint warnings about missing javadoc tags and comments Jayathirth D V
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8251123: doclint warnings about missing javadoc tags and comments Jayathirth D V
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8251123: doclint warnings about missing javadoc tags and comments Phil Race
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8251123: doclint warnings about missing javadoc tags and comments Phil Race
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8251123: doclint warnings about missing javadoc tags and comments Phil Race
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8251123: doclint warnings about missing javadoc tags and comments [v2] Sergey Bylokhov
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8251123: doclint warnings about missing javadoc tags and comments [v2] Sergey Bylokhov
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8251123: doclint warnings about missing javadoc tags and comments [v2] Sergey Bylokhov
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8251123: doclint warnings about missing javadoc tags and comments [v2] Phil Race
  • <i18n dev> Integrated: 8251123: doclint warnings about missing javadoc tags and comments Sergey Bylokhov
• <i18n dev> RFR: 8253322 : Update the specification added to some of some newly added constructors Sergey Bylokhov
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253322 : Update the specification in the newly added constructors Prasanta Sadhukhan
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253322 : Update the specification in the newly added constructors Phil Race
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253322 : Update the specification in the newly added constructors Sergey Bylokhov
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253322 : Update the specification in the newly added constructors Phil Race
  • <i18n dev> Integrated: 8253322 : Update the specification in the newly added constructors Sergey Bylokhov
• <i18n dev> RFR: 8252195: AWT Accessibility API nested classes rely on default constructors Phil Race
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8252195: AWT Accessibility API nested classes rely on default constructors Sergey Bylokhov
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8252195: AWT Accessibility API nested classes rely on default constructors Phil Race
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8252195: AWT Accessibility API nested classes rely on default constructors [v2] Phil Race
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8252195: AWT Accessibility API nested classes rely on default constructors [v2] Sergey Bylokhov
  • <i18n dev> Integrated: 8252195: AWT Accessibility API nested classes rely on default constructors Phil Race
• <i18n dev> RFR: 8253208: Move CDS related code to a separate class Yumin Qi
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253208: Move CDS related code to a separate class Alan Bateman
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253208: Move CDS related code to a separate class Ioi Lam
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253208: Move CDS related code to a separate class [v2] Yumin Qi
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253208: Move CDS related code to a separate class [v2] Yumin Qi
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253208: Move CDS related code to a separate class [v2] Mandy Chung
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253208: Move CDS related code to a separate class [v2] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253208: Move CDS related code to a separate class [v2] Ioi Lam
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253208: Move CDS related code to a separate class [v3] Yumin Qi
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253208: Move CDS related code to a separate class [v3] Mandy Chung
  • <i18n dev> Integrated: 8253208: Move CDS related code to a separate class Yumin Qi
• <i18n dev> RFR: 8253321: java.util.Locale.LanguageRange#equals is inconsistent after calling hashCode Naoto Sato
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253321: java.util.Locale.LanguageRange#equals is inconsistent after calling hashCode Joe Wang
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253321: java.util.Locale.LanguageRange#equals is inconsistent after calling hashCode Joe Wang
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253321: java.util.Locale.LanguageRange#equals is inconsistent after calling hashCode [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253321: java.util.Locale.LanguageRange#equals is inconsistent after calling hashCode [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253321: java.util.Locale.LanguageRange#equals is inconsistent after calling hashCode [v2] Joe Wang
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253321: java.util.Locale.LanguageRange#equals is inconsistent after calling hashCode [v2] Roger Riggs
  • <i18n dev> Integrated: 8253321: java.util.Locale.LanguageRange#equals is inconsistent after calling hashCode Naoto Sato
• <i18n dev> RFR: 8253153: Mentioning of "hour-of-minute" in java.time.temporal.TemporalField JavaDoc Naoto Sato
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253153: Mentioning of "hour-of-minute" in java.time.temporal.TemporalField JavaDoc Joe Wang
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253153: Mentioning of "hour-of-minute" in java.time.temporal.TemporalField JavaDoc Lance Andersen
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253153: Mentioning of "hour-of-minute" in java.time.temporal.TemporalField JavaDoc Roger Riggs
  • <i18n dev> Integrated: 8253153: Mentioning of "hour-of-minute" in java.time.temporal.TemporalField JavaDoc Naoto Sato
• <i18n dev> RFR: 8253240: No javadoc for DecimalFormatSymbols.hashCode() Naoto Sato
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253240: No javadoc for DecimalFormatSymbols.hashCode() Roger Riggs
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253240: No javadoc for DecimalFormatSymbols.hashCode() [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253240: No javadoc for DecimalFormatSymbols.hashCode() Lance Andersen
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253240: No javadoc for DecimalFormatSymbols.hashCode() [v2] Roger Riggs
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253240: No javadoc for DecimalFormatSymbols.hashCode() [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253240: No javadoc for DecimalFormatSymbols.hashCode() [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8253240: No javadoc for DecimalFormatSymbols.hashCode() [v2] Roger Riggs
  • <i18n dev> Integrated: 8253240: No javadoc for DecimalFormatSymbols.hashCode() Naoto Sato
• Re: <i18n dev> [BUG] Java 15: DecimalFormatSymbols overrides equals but not hashCode Naoto Sato
• <i18n dev> RFR: 8220483: Calendar.setTime(Date date) throws NPE with Date date = null Naoto Sato
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8220483: Calendar.setTime(Date date) throws NPE with Date date = null Lance Andersen
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8220483: Calendar.setTime(Date date) throws NPE with Date date = null Joe Wang
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8220483: Calendar.setTime(Date date) throws NPE with Date date = null Naoto Sato
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8220483: Calendar.setTime(Date date) throws NPE with Date date = null Naoto Sato
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8220483: Calendar.setTime(Date date) throws NPE with Date date = null Joe Wang
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8220483: Calendar.setTime(Date date) throws NPE with Date date = null Joe Wang
  • <i18n dev> Integrated: 8220483: Calendar.setTime(Date date) throws NPE with Date date = null Naoto Sato
• Re: <i18n dev> Case insensitive regexes and collators Naoto Sato
• <i18n dev> RFR: 8252999: replace all String.equals("") usages with String.isEmpty() Dmitriy Dumanskiy
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8252999: replace all String.equals("") usages with String.isEmpty() thatsIch
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8252999: replace all String.equals("") usages with String.isEmpty() Dmitriy Dumanskiy
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8252999: replace all String.equals("") usages with String.isEmpty() Kevin Rushforth
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8252999: replace all String.equals("") usages with String.isEmpty() Dmitriy Dumanskiy
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8252999: Cleanup: replace .equals("") with .isEmpty() within all codebase Alan Bateman
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8252999: Cleanup: replace .equals("") with .isEmpty() within all codebase David Holmes
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8252999: Cleanup: replace .equals("") with .isEmpty() within all codebase Dmitriy Dumanskiy
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8252999: Cleanup: replace .equals("") with .isEmpty() within all codebase Jonathan Gibbons
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8252999: Cleanup: replace .equals("") with .isEmpty() within all codebase Kevin Rushforth
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8252999: Cleanup: replace .equals("") with .isEmpty() within all codebase David Holmes
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8252999: Cleanup: replace .equals("") with .isEmpty() within all codebase Alan Bateman
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8252999: Cleanup: replace .equals("") with .isEmpty() within all codebase Jorn Vernee
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8252999: replace all String.equals("") usages with String.isEmpty() Sergey Bylokhov
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8252999: Cleanup: replace .equals("") with .isEmpty() within all codebase Phil Race
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8252999: Cleanup: replace .equals("") with .isEmpty() within all codebase Dmitriy Dumanskiy
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8252999: Cleanup: replace .equals("") with .isEmpty() within all codebase Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8252999: Cleanup: replace .equals("") with .isEmpty() within all codebase Stuart Marks
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8252999: Cleanup: replace .equals("") with .isEmpty() within all codebase Dmitriy Dumanskiy
  • <i18n dev> Withdrawn: 8252999: Cleanup: replace .equals("") with .isEmpty() within all codebase Dmitriy Dumanskiy
• <i18n dev> RFR: 8138732: Rename @HotSpotIntrinsicCandidate to @IntrinsicCandidate and move it to the jdk.internal.vm.annotation package Philippe Marschall
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8138732: Rename @HotSpotIntrinsicCandidate to @IntrinsicCandidate and move it to the jdk.internal.vm.annotation package Alan Bateman
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8138732: Rename @HotSpotIntrinsicCandidate to @IntrinsicCandidate and move it to the jdk.internal.vm.annotation package David Holmes
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8138732: Rename @HotSpotIntrinsicCandidate to @IntrinsicCandidate and move it to the jdk.internal.vm.annotation package David Holmes
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8138732: Rename @HotSpotIntrinsicCandidate to @IntrinsicCandidate and move it to the jdk.internal.vm.annotation package [v2] Philippe Marschall
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8138732: Rename @HotSpotIntrinsicCandidate to @IntrinsicCandidate and move it to the jdk.internal.vm.annotation package [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8138732: Rename @HotSpotIntrinsicCandidate to @IntrinsicCandidate and move it to the jdk.internal.vm.annotation package [v2] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8138732: Rename @HotSpotIntrinsicCandidate to @IntrinsicCandidate and move it to the jdk.internal.vm.annotation package [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8138732: Rename @HotSpotIntrinsicCandidate to @IntrinsicCandidate and move it to the jdk.internal.vm.annotation package [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8138732: Rename @HotSpotIntrinsicCandidate to @IntrinsicCandidate and move it to the jdk.internal.vm.annotation package [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8138732: Rename @HotSpotIntrinsicCandidate to @IntrinsicCandidate and move it to the jdk.internal.vm.annotation package [v2] Erik Gahlin
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8138732: Rename @HotSpotIntrinsicCandidate to @IntrinsicCandidate and move it to the jdk.internal.vm.annotation package [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8138732: Rename @HotSpotIntrinsicCandidate to @IntrinsicCandidate and move it to the jdk.internal.vm.annotation package [v3] Philippe Marschall
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8138732: Rename @HotSpotIntrinsicCandidate to @IntrinsicCandidate and move it to the jdk.internal.vm.annotation package [v4] Philippe Marschall
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8138732: Rename @HotSpotIntrinsicCandidate to @IntrinsicCandidate and move it to the jdk.internal.vm.annotation package [v5] Philippe Marschall
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8138732: Rename @HotSpotIntrinsicCandidate to @IntrinsicCandidate and move it to the jdk.internal.vm.annotation package [v5] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8138732: Rename @HotSpotIntrinsicCandidate to @IntrinsicCandidate and move it to the jdk.internal.vm.annotation package [v5] Erik Gahlin
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8138732: Rename @HotSpotIntrinsicCandidate to @IntrinsicCandidate and move it to the jdk.internal.vm.annotation package [v5] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8138732: Rename @HotSpotIntrinsicCandidate to @IntrinsicCandidate and move it to the jdk.internal.vm.annotation package [v5] Philippe Marschall
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8138732: Rename @HotSpotIntrinsicCandidate to @IntrinsicCandidate and move it to the jdk.internal.vm.annotation package [v5] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8138732: Rename @HotSpotIntrinsicCandidate to @IntrinsicCandidate and move it to the jdk.internal.vm.annotation package [v6] Philippe Marschall
  • <i18n dev> Integrated: 8138732: Rename @HotSpotIntrinsicCandidate to @IntrinsicCandidate and move it to the jdk.internal.vm.annotation package Philippe Marschall
• <i18n dev> RFR: 8252552: DecimalFormat javadoc contains HTML tags in example code Naoto Sato
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8252552: DecimalFormat javadoc contains HTML tags in example code Lance Andersen
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8252552: DecimalFormat javadoc contains HTML tags in example code Joe Wang
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8252552: DecimalFormat javadoc contains HTML tags in example code Naoto Sato
• <i18n dev> RFR: 8252497: Incorrect numeric currency code for ROL Yuri Nesterenko
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8252497: Incorrect numeric currency code for ROL Naoto Sato
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8252497: Incorrect numeric currency code for ROL Naoto Sato
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8252497: Incorrect numeric currency code for ROL Yuri Nesterenko
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8252497: Incorrect numeric currency code for ROL Yuri Nesterenko
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8252497: Incorrect numeric currency code for ROL Naoto Sato
• <i18n dev> RFR: 8251499: no-placeholder compact number patterns throw IllegalArgumentException naoto . sato
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8251499: no-placeholder compact number patterns throw IllegalArgumentException Joe Wang
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8251499: no-placeholder compact number patterns throw IllegalArgumentException naoto . sato
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8251499: no-placeholder compact number patterns throw IllegalArgumentException Joe Wang
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8251499: no-placeholder compact number patterns throw IllegalArgumentException naoto . sato
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8251499: no-placeholder compact number patterns throw IllegalArgumentException Joe Wang
• <i18n dev> RFR: 8248655: Support supplementary characters in String case insensitive operations naoto . sato
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8248655: Support supplementary characters in String case insensitive operations naoto . sato
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8248655: Support supplementary characters in String case insensitive operations Joe Wang
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8248655: Support supplementary characters in String case insensitive operations naoto . sato
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8248655: Support supplementary characters in String case insensitive operations Joe Wang
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8248655: Support supplementary characters in String case insensitive operations naoto . sato
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8248655: Support supplementary characters in String case insensitive operations Mark Davis ☕️
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8248655: Support supplementary characters in String case insensitive operations naoto . sato
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8248655: Support supplementary characters in String case insensitive operations Joe Wang
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8248655: Support supplementary characters in String case insensitive operations naoto . sato
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8248655: Support supplementary characters in String case insensitive operations naoto . sato
  • Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8248655: Support supplementary characters in String case insensitive operations Joe Wang

• Earlier messages
• Later messages