On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 07:03:59 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov <s...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> Looks like different people use a different style for the new constructors,
> it will be good to unify them.
>
> The text "Constructor for subclasses to call." should be used in the
> protected constructors in the abstract classes
> In all other cases the text "Constructs an {@code ClassName}." should be used
> A period (full stop) to the end of all javadoc comments, should be added if
> it is missing
>
> I have started from https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8252721
> See
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8252908?focusedCommentId=14370006&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-14370006
>
> But since I already touched a bunch of classes, I decided to update some
> other fixes as well.
>
> This will update the changes for:
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8252721
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8252195
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8250858
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 8239b67d
Author: Sergey Bylokhov <s...@openjdk.org>
URL: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/commit/8239b67d
Stats: 152 lines in 67 files changed: 15 ins; 0 del; 137 mod
8253322: Update the specification in the newly added constructors
Reviewed-by: psadhukhan, prr
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/315
