On Wed, 26 May 2021 02:22:42 GMT, Tagir F. Valeev <tval...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Inspired by PR#4088. Most of the changes are done automatically using >> IntelliJ IDEA refactoring. Some manual adjustments are also performed, >> including indentations, moving comments, extracting common cast out of >> switch expression branches, etc. >> >> I also noticed that there are some switches having one branch only in >> JapaneseImperialCalendar.java. Probably it would be better to replace them >> with `if` statement? > > Tagir F. Valeev has updated the pull request incrementally with two > additional commits since the last revision: > > - JapaneseImperialCalendar: use switch expressions > - Use yield in java.util.Calendar.Builder.build Globally looks good. I haven't reviewed `src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/regex/Pattern.java` due to formatting issues. See also my other remark about `java.util.concurrent`. src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/FutureTask.java line 495: > 493: * @return a string representation of this FutureTask > 494: */ > 495: public String toString() { Classes in java.util.concurrent are handled upstream. It would probably be better to leave them out of this patch. Or synchronize with @DougLea to see how to bring these changes in the upstream repo. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4161