On Tue, 25 May 2021 11:49:18 GMT, Tagir F. Valeev <tval...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Inspired by PR#4088. Most of the changes are done automatically using
>> IntelliJ IDEA refactoring. Some manual adjustments are also performed,
>> including indentations, moving comments, extracting common cast out of
>> switch expression branches, etc.
>>
>> I also noticed that there are some switches having one branch only in
>> JapaneseImperialCalendar.java. Probably it would be better to replace them
>> with `if` statement?
>
> Tagir F. Valeev has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last revision:
>
> More vertical alignment
src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/JapaneseImperialCalendar.java line 1124:
> 1122: return Math.max(LEAST_MAX_VALUES[YEAR], d.getYear());
> 1123: }
> 1124: }
A switch with one element here is kind of weird. I would turn this into
"return switch (field) { ... }", with two cases, YEAR and default.
src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/JapaneseImperialCalendar.java line 1371:
> 1369: }
> 1370: }
> 1371: }
Pull value assignment out of switch?
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4161
