Okutsu-san,
I have one question. It looks like if the user specifies the additional
era syntactically incorrect, it throws a RuntimeException. Should it
just be ignored, as the spec reads "If the given era is invalid, such as
the since value before the beginning of the last predefined era, the
given era will be ignored"?
Naoto
On 7/22/14, 12:06 AM, Masayoshi Okutsu wrote:
Hello,
Please review the change for JDK-8048123. This change removes all the
era definitions in ${java.home}/lib/calendars.properties. (The property
file will eventually be gone later.) The major change is that any new
era of the Japanese calendar should now be defined using new property
"jdk.calendar.japanese.supplemental.era".
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8048123
Webrev includes some unrelated cleanups.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~okutsu/9/8048123/webrev.00/
Thanks,
Masayoshi
