Please also provide a regression test along with the fix. Thanks.
Naoto
On 1/30/13 6:08 PM, Frank Ding wrote:
Hi Naoto,
Thank you.
To Sean,
Could you please shed your light or anything I can do?
Best regards,
Frank
On 1/31/2013 3:15 AM, Naoto Sato wrote:
OK, I am fine with backporting the fix. Please go ahead.
Naoto
On 1/29/13 9:34 PM, Frank Ding wrote:
Hi Naoto and Sean
I think we can verify it in Japanese environment.
The reason for backporting is that it's quite safe to do and also
would be better if the defect is fixed in JDK 7 also. Please let me
know if there is any idea. Thank you.
Best regards,
Frank
While I think fix looks good (that's why I approved the change in
jdk8),
I don't find any reason for backporting this change into 7u line. Is
there any strong reason for backport?
Naoto
On 9/18/12 10:37 AM, Seán Coffey wrote:
> cc'ing i18n-dev alias here also. i18n fixes can be difficult to test.
> Was it possible to verify this fix on jdk7u Shi Jun ?
>
> Any thoughts from i18n reviewers on this one being backported to 7u ?
>
> regards,
> Sean.
>
> On 17/09/2012 08:07, Shi Jun Zhang wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to request for approval to push the following change into
7u10.
>>
>> Changeset in jdk8
>>http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/awt/jdk/rev/6694d9e99716
>>
>> Webrev
>>http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zhangshj/jdk7u/7174233/webrev.00/
>>
>> Reviewed by anthony, naoto
>>
>> Review thread
>>http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2012-June/002919.html
>>
>
