I endorse your statement on Kashmir.

On 12 July 2016 at 17:29, amitabh pandey <[email protected]> wrote:

> I endorse!
>
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Brp Bhaskar <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Statement on Kashmir.
>> ENDORSED.
>> BRP Bhaskar
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 1:13 PM, ram puniyani <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: shabnam hashmi <[email protected]>
>>> Date: Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 1:01 PM
>>> Subject: Statement on Kashmir Endorse by 4pm Today
>>> To: shabnam hashmi <[email protected]>
>>>
>>>
>>> Kindly endorse and get others to endorse too by 4pm today
>>> -----------
>>>
>>> We write this in anguish at another alarming spiral of violence in
>>> Kashmir, when a discredited old playbook has yet again been deployed to
>>> wreak havoc with civilian life.
>>> Kashmir’s escalating violence follows a familiar pattern: a killing, a
>>> funeral where rage is vented through slogans and stones, and volleys of
>>> lethal gunfire in response. In 2010, this cycle rolled on repeatedly
>>> through four months, claiming over 110 lives, mostly of Kashmiri youth,
>>> including a number who were too young to know.
>>> Nothing has been learnt from that year of catastrophe. The trigger for
>>> the current surge of unrest in Kashmir was the killing on July 8 of Burhan
>>> Wani, a militant of the Hizbul Mujahedin. The circumstances of Wani’s
>>> killing are yet to be fully explained. It is nonetheless ironic that it
>>> occurred on the very day the Indian Supreme Court issued a far-reaching
>>> judgment in the context of fake encounters in the state of Manipur,
>>> emphasising the illegality of the use of excessive and retaliatory force by
>>> the army, security forces and police. These strictures apply even in
>>> disturbed areas under AFSPA. Kashmir is an arena where the Supreme Court’s
>>> observations that the rule of law would apply “even when dealing with the
>>> enemy”, and that indeed, whatever the challenges, “the country’s commitment
>>> to the rule of law remains steadfast”, are breached on a daily basis.
>>> Available accounts of Burhan Wani’s life in militancy indicate that he
>>> was as a 16-year old, embittered and radicalised during the 2010 turmoil by
>>> the casual humiliations heaped on ordinary Kashmiris by the mass
>>> deployments of security personnel. He witnessed repeated violent incursions
>>> into his home and the harassment of near relations in what are called
>>> “crackdowns”, in terminology that has entered the youth argot of the
>>> valley. The death of his brother in a police encounter, when he had nothing
>>> to do with the militancy, is believed to have further hardened his resolve.
>>> Burhan Wani’s life story should be cautionary warning that the
>>> heavy-handed, militaristic Indian approach to Kashmir, has only led to a
>>> quarter century of siege and growing alienation.
>>> Wani’s funeral on July 9 in the southern Kashmir town of Tral witnessed
>>> a gathering of several tens of thousands. As protests broke out in this and
>>> other locations, security forces responded with maximum force. The death
>>> toll of thirty in a matter of three days, tells its own grim story.
>>> Excessive and indiscriminate lethal force continues to be used for
>>> purposes of law enforcement. This is in brazen contempt of the U.N. Basic
>>> Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials,
>>> which do not allow for departure even in exceptional circumstances such as
>>> internal political instability or public emergency. Pellet guns, introduced
>>> in 2010 for crowd control, purportedly on the ground that it injures and
>>> does not kill, have caused permanent injuries and irreversible loss of
>>> eyesight to at least 92 young men.
>>> The upsurge of civil unrest comes after a long sequence of intelligence
>>> reports that flagged rising discontent at the new political arrangements in
>>> Jammu and Kashmir. The BJP’s arrival in the portals of power and its
>>> determined pursuit of a majoritarian agenda, have much to do with this.
>>> Curiously, the intelligence warnings have focused on widening access to
>>> the internet and social media as a disruptive influence. This diagnosis
>>> which focuses on the symptoms rather than underlying realities, has fed
>>> directly into the shutdown of internet services in Kashmir, the thirteenth
>>> such closure in three years.
>>> Certain recent observations of the Supreme Court, though made in
>>> reference to Manipur, bear repetition as general principles. Mass
>>> deployment of the army and security forces in aid of civil authorities
>>> always is predicated on the premise that “normalcy would be restored within
>>> a reasonable period”. If normalcy is not restored for a “prolonged or
>>> indeterminate period”, it would be firm evidence of the “failure” of the
>>> civil administration or of the armed forces, or both. Whatever the case, an
>>> unending state of unrest could not “be a fig leaf for prolonged, permanent
>>> or indefinite deployment of the armed forces as it would mock at our
>>> democratic process”.
>>> The time is long past, if ever there was one, when a solution to the
>>> Kashmir problem could be achieved through force. Continuing recourse to
>>> this option and the prolonged and bloody stalemate that has ensued, have
>>> fuelled a mood of anger and despair in Kashmir. But with firmer iterations
>>> of the military option from the highest political leadership, a dark mood
>>> has taken hold in the rest of the country, a doubling down on the current
>>> strategy and a tendency to brush off every manifestation of failure with
>>> hateful and intemperate rhetoric directed at the people of Kashmir.
>>> We recall the statesmanship shown by Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee
>>> in 2003, when he went to Srinagar during a particularly dark time, held out
>>> a “hand of friendship” to Pakistan  and said that the dialogue on Kashmir
>>> would be held within the paradigm of humanity (insaaniyat ke daayre mein).
>>> It is particularly unfortunate that no Union Minister has visited Kashmir
>>> in this crisis and that the state leadership and elected legislators are
>>> reportedly too insecure to venture out among the people.
>>> We call for urgent steps from the Central and State government to
>>> prevent civilians being killed and injured, and immediate steps towards
>>> demilitarisation of the Valley and an inclusive political initiative. This
>>> has to go along with an urgent review of AFSPA, leading to its repeal
>>> alongside the entire constellation of special security laws that reward
>>> atrocities on civilians and encourage impunity. We urge all political
>>> parties to pressure the Government to open a political dialogue in good
>>> faith with all relevant parties to ensure that the bleeding wounds of
>>> Kashmir are staunched.
>>>
>>> NAME Organisation/ profession
>>> 1. Vrinda Grover Lawyer
>>> 2. Sukumar Muralidharan Journalist
>>> 3. Anuradha Chenoy Prof. JNU
>>> 4. Kamal Chenoy Prof. JNU
>>> 5. Shabnam Hashmi Social activist - ANHAD
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "humanrights movement" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To post to this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "humanrights movement" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "humanrights movement" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> .
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



-- 
Susmit Bose
Post: 19B, Ballygunge Place Kolkata 700019 (India)
Email: [email protected] and [email protected]
Web: www.susmitbose.com
http://www.youtube.com/user/susmitbose

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"humanrights movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to