[email protected] schrieb am Freitag, 11. April 2025 um 12:59:45 UTC+2: Which brings me to my two questions:
1. Is there a way to naively define an offset for an image with respect to another image when there are no control points? I suppose I could write an estimated TrX and TrY in the 'image lines' portion of the pto - but without any control points, I suspect the images will still be seen as 'not connected'. Should I insert some synthetic (but hopefully semi accurate) control points? Will that work, or will those get discarded by say cpclean? Hugin has already the geocpset tool https://wiki.panotools.org/Geocpset to set some kind of dummy control points to keep these featureless images in connection to its surrounding images during optimisation. It needs some rough positions of the images. This should be possible in your use case with the 4x4 grid. See also https://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_Panorama_Workflow for another example. But don't run cpclean afterwards. (First run cpclean and then geocpset, not vice versa.) Thomas -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/8e8e0a6a-f1c7-48a0-acef-940d3516462bn%40googlegroups.com.
