Mostly with Photoshop or Affinity. I used Hugin and, with a basic start-to-finish approach, have gotten very nice panoramas too. The issue I’m having is that I’m deliberately trying to produce bad/misaligned/unblended panoramas, and this can be difficult to systematize. Photoshop will produce tiled, unblended results but only if I overwhelm it to a very specific degree; if I add too many images, it will freeze and won’t spit anything out. Affinity, meanwhile, always blends no matter the result it gets. I think Hugin is the best option is because I can make choices about all of the control points that decide just how aligned or misaligned my panoramas are. The issue is that I just need to figure out how to prevent it from trying to blend the component images into a seamless stitch.
> On Nov 9, 2023, at 11:11 PM, David W. Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > > How do you make your panoramas now? > > On 11/9/23 20:47, Alexander Drecun wrote: >> <Screenshot 2023-11-09 at 10.45.00 PM.png> >> <Screenshot 2023-11-09 at 10.46.33 PM.png> >> Yeah, a hard cut. I'm aiming for a stitch that is basically the tiled images >> layered over one another before any blending or exposure correction is done. >> I've attached a screencap from the preview window and a screencap of what >> it's looking like once stitched. (Btw it's intentional that things are >> misaligned.) >> >> I'll try these entries with Enblend to see if they make a difference. How do >> I leave out "photometric optimization?" I'm still relatively new to Hugin >> and so some of these things are a bit over my head. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Alex >> >> On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 6:13 PM David W. Jones <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> Hmm, so you want hard seams between images - no blending, just a sharp >>> cut from one image to the next? >>> >>> Gunter's reference to the online documentation might have the solution >>> in it. >>> >>> Maybe one option is to set enblend's levels to 1? I think "--levels=1" >>> tells enblend tto blend as little as possible between images. >>> >>> On 11/8/23 20:07, Alexander Drecun wrote: >>> > Is there any way to stitch a panorama without having Hugin blend/match >>> > the exposure across the component images? Specifically, I want to see >>> > the seams and edges of each component image in the stitched panorama. >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > >>> > Alex > > -- > David W. Jones > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wandering the landscape of god > http://dancingtreefrog.com <http://dancingtreefrog.com/> > My password is the last 8 digits of π. > > -- > A list of frequently asked questions is available at: > http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/0ac4d1b8-ba20-4733-9547-b1b03abc6dff%40gmail.com > > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/0ac4d1b8-ba20-4733-9547-b1b03abc6dff%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>. -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/B9EC7828-8BAC-484B-B969-88F5EB1668A1%40gmail.com.
