Am Thu, 13 Oct 2022 19:01:53 +0100 schrieb Bruno Postle <[email protected]>:
> The control point error is reported in terms of pixels in the output
> panorama. So if 'calculate optimal size' changed your 3000x1500 panorama
> into a 30000x15000 panorama then all the control point distances will be
> ten times bigger. The output will look the same but with higher resolution.
>
> You have a single row of images, so the canvas size (in pixels) of your
> panorama should be about the same height as your input images. Rather than
> clicking on 'calculate optimal size' (which isn't working for you), I would
> directly enter a canvas size that is a bit more reasonable.
>
> I suspect the problem is that very wide rectilinear panoramas are not ideal
> for this automatic calculation.
>
Would be nice to have an option to see the distances proportional to the angle.
Something like (angle * 1000 / PI)
Kornel
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/20221015175425.1f8a324a%40admin1-desktop.
pgpitJjw3es4H.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
