The control point error is reported in terms of pixels in the output panorama. So if 'calculate optimal size' changed your 3000x1500 panorama into a 30000x15000 panorama then all the control point distances will be ten times bigger. The output will look the same but with higher resolution.
You have a single row of images, so the canvas size (in pixels) of your panorama should be about the same height as your input images. Rather than clicking on 'calculate optimal size' (which isn't working for you), I would directly enter a canvas size that is a bit more reasonable. I suspect the problem is that very wide rectilinear panoramas are not ideal for this automatic calculation. -- Bruno On Wed, 12 Oct 2022, 23:55 Alexander Drecun, <[email protected]> wrote: > So what's curious is that the pano doesn't look like tiles in Hugin. That > comes only once I've stitched it and opened it in another application like > Photoshop. The pano at 3000x1500 canvas and at the optimal size canvas look > identical except that the control points have gone from great to terrible. > This is what it looks like in the Preview window before and after I > calculate optimal size. It's bizarre. > -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/CAJV99ZhLO6GLFsSjmFrybpm4te2NKTcT-nMwRqOV7mqXotMZKg%40mail.gmail.com.
