I seem to recall that the Hugin team doesn't have anyone with a Mac
build environment?
On 8/22/21 11:59 AM, Robb Campbell wrote:
Thanks, I didn't notice that mine is actually the 2019. I can find a
source code / tarball for the 2020 version (I'm probably using the wrong
words), but not a binary / executable.
On Tuesday, August 17, 2021 at 2:09:52 AM UTC-5 GnomeNomad wrote:
Hmm, 2019? I don't have a Mac, but current version of Hugin is 2020:
http://hugin.sourceforge.net/releases/2020.0.0/en.shtml
<http://hugin.sourceforge.net/releases/2020.0.0/en.shtml>
On 8/16/21 12:47 PM, Robb Campbell wrote:
> So . . . does anyone have any information on this? I have very
much the
> same problem. Hugin (2019, Mac) can't load images into a preview
the way
> it could before (2012, Mac). The individual images are scrambled
like a
> Fifteen Puzzle and the Layout has a bunch of wrong links.
Apparently a
> failure of automatic control point detection, even though they look
> super obvious. My only "solution" was to pull out my old Mac and
yeah,
> Hugin 2012 made the pano with no problem.
>
> Maybe the problem was the two varieties of Preview: Fast Preview and
> Preview? The Fast Preview flaked out after a while (mostly blank
gray),
> so maybe the Mac / OpenGL / something is incompatible? I know about
> control points and I've read lots of Hugin documentation. It's hard
> chasing down possible problems in Hugin because the whole project is
> pretty Jeremy Bearimy (plate of spaghetti).
>
> If anyone sees anything in here you can suggest about, thanks. If
not,
> silence is fine. Thanks, Robb
>
> On Wednesday, July 14, 2021 at 6:44:14 PM UTC-5
[email protected] wrote:
>
> Thanks for all your help
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Jul 14, 2021, at 7:35 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Wednesday, 14 July 2021 at 16:35:03 -0400, Hugin developers
> list wrote:
> >> Thank you. Yes, Affinity uses control points very similar to
Hugin.
> >> I did not bother to insert CPs because I was only trying to
> point out that Hugin was having trouble finding the cPs, but
> Affinity had no such problem.
> >> Being able to use Hugin is still my choice (when it works)
> because it has fewer artifacts.
> >
> > As Klaus Foehl says, you might like to read the instructions.
If you
> > don't bother to use the product the way it is intended, you can't
> > complain about it not doing what you want. My guess is that
Affinity
> > automatically does what it thinks you want, while Hugin gives
you a
> > choice. It even tells you what to do in the first of your
images. If
> > you don't make the choice, it won't do what you hope.
> >
> > Please try to use it as intended and report your results.
> >
> > Greg
> > --
--
David W. Jones
[email protected]
wandering the landscape of god
http://dancingtreefrog.com
My password is the last 8 digits of π.
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/2662959c-de91-9510-96ff-c10a57cf86dc%40gmail.com.
