Has anyone out there tried either the x64 or x86 versions of Multiblend 2.0 on Windows XP or Windows Vista? Someone's reporting vcredist problems and I'm not sure if it's because I built using the latest platform toolset.
On Sunday, 4 April 2021 at 17:11:16 UTC+1 [email protected] wrote: > I'll give it a shot. last time I used it it for a aerial 360 it removed > cars and other ground objects. > > On Friday, March 5, 2021 at 3:57:30 PM UTC-8 Monkey wrote: > >> *(* for a Gigapixel mosaic, anyway; it's complicated, see below)* >> >> http://horman.net/multiblend/ >> >> It seems Groups won't let me post the quasi-essay I had written, complete >> with images, so the link above will have to suffice. >> >> Here's Multiblend 2.0, faster, better, more... blendy. I'm calling it a >> Release Candidate because there's only so much testing I can stand to do, >> and I've hit a dead-end with features, so I thought I'd put it out there >> for people to try. I expect some bugs to be found pretty quickly, which >> I'll hopefully fix pretty quickly. >> >> It's released under GPLv3. >> > -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/c647a12b-63d8-48f8-b409-0bfbe191f6a7n%40googlegroups.com.
