Haven't tried it for years. Verdandi's default blend wasn't even close
enough to quality to use.
Enblend has been working fine ever since and its speed is fine with me.
On 1/20/21 3:06 AM, Monkey wrote:
Did you try both seam modes? They do quite different things, and the
default is not the Enblend-like one.
On Tuesday, 19 January 2021 at 22:00:11 UTC GnomeNomad wrote:
On January 19, 2021 10:54:28 AM HST, Monkey <[email protected]> wrote:
I haven't used Hugin for a while, but I recently started updatng
my old Multiblend project as I had recently rewritten the
pyramid processing part of it for another project.
I hadn't used the built-in Hugin blender (Verdandi), so I gave
it a try and was pleasantly surprised with the results. Wtih
seam=blend, it does a great job of matching the exposure of
images (even if it does so relative to the first image in the
list, seemingly undoing much of the work Hugin may have done in
balance the exposure of control points), the end result looks
very good, and seems to do just as good a job at optimising
seams as Enblend does.
With that in mind, and given that Verdandi must be at least
dozens of times faster then Enblend (and likely gets
exponentially faster as mosaic size increases), what are the
reasons, if any, for using Enblend (and still having it be the
default blender in Hugin) over Verdandi?
Only time I tried Verdandi, it didn't do as nearly a good job as
enblend.
--
David W. Jones
[email protected]
wandering the landscape of god
http://dancingtreefrog.com
My password is the last 8 digits of π.
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/bc62862d-90ff-62e7-0385-73163c4148f8%40gmail.com.
