Hi Thomas, I use Hugin since version 2009 - and I never saw that :-/
But we are talking from different things: this is the angle per pixel, but > HFOV is the angle for the full pano. If you pano is not only 10 pixels wide > the resolution per pixel is better then a hundredth of a degree given the > precision of HFOV by a tenth of degree. > To play with your numbers: 3.5 m on 20 km correspond to 0.01 deg/pixel, > with 10000 pixels wide this is a hfov of 100 deg. Taking a hfov of 101 deg > (+1 deg) changes to resolution by 0.0001 deg/pixel or 3 cm on 20 km (or > with the current precision of 0.1 deg 3 mm on 20 km). > Sorry, but you did not convince me. You're right but the farthest I see, the greatest the error : report an error of 3cm per pixel at 20km on a 10k px wide pano , and you'll get a difference of 300 meters for the whole distance represented by the v/hfov . While working with 0.01 it would only represent 30 meters, which is negligible for such distance, from my point of view ... -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/CAGoXyCmhVg4aAbeZReZS0-OQ%2B00peugWx8w3APMZCvi5%2Bsda1g%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
