Hands up everyone having a generally better TF2 experience since this
update! (raises hand)


On 26 January 2014 10:01, ics <[email protected]> wrote:

> They are not going to kill TF2. It still brings them money and while
> people make contributions to workshop and new content, they can just pack
> it in and use that in the game. People buy keys and they get money that way.
>
> But i don't think we get a reply, they have become too big to answer us
> little folks.
>
> -ics
>
> Paul kirjoitti:
>
>> They're obviously content with the idea they wish to slowly kill Team
>> Fortress 2, or at the very least try to. They seem to be happy to ignore
>> our complaints as always :x. I agree that the option to make official
>> servers not default would be somewhat the answer, but getting Valve to do
>> that or someone at Valve to answer our concerns is probably going to be a
>> miracle. Perhaps if we keep up with the complaints on the mailing list they
>> will eventually respond and agree.
>>
>>
>> On 26 January 2014 05:57, ics <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>     Yes lets think about the end user that has been enjoying community
>>     servers and the care we take of our players, keeping cheaters out
>>     and other troublemaking trollers and especially offering a place
>>     to play on. For over 6 years our communities have helped TF2 grow.
>>     Only after game went Free to Play, Valve added their own servers.
>>     Do you even know where the players played before that? On our
>>     community servers only. It was decided that when game goes free to
>>     play, they will add extra servers to get new players to get on and
>>     get familiar to the game. Thats what they have been doing all
>>     along and they did thought the end user. Now grip tightens for
>>     unknown reason.
>>
>>     The existing players will keep playing on our servers but due to
>>     severe lack of new ones ever finding our servers, it will get our
>>     servers emptied. The decision that was made is absolutely horrible
>>     and one sided. Yes, it's their game and they can do whatever they
>>     want but simply forgetting every server owner contribution to this
>>     game in the past, especially the ones that have been here since
>>     TF2 release and before, it's really sad to see it was made without
>>     atleast warning us ahead of the change and telling why it has to
>>     be like this.
>>
>>     -ics
>>
>>     Jon Just kirjoitti:
>>
>>         Until valve can get rid of premium servers, ad farms, and
>>         server chains that monopolize the quick play system, I think
>>         that this change should stay. I feel bad that community
>>         servers have to be punished as well, but you need to think of
>>         the average tf2 player before the server owner.
>>
>>         Sent from my iPod
>>
>>         On Jan 25, 2014, at 2:32 PM, Supreet <[email protected]
>>         <mailto:[email protected]>
>>         <mailto:[email protected]
>>
>>         <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
>>
>>             Hello,
>>
>>             I think it is very wrong to accuse certain communities and
>>             players who may or may not be exploiting the quick play
>>             system.
>>
>>             Saigns or NightTeam is famous because there's a
>>             considerable amount of population that loves the
>>             customized gameplay. On the other hand, Skial I believe
>>             runs the best vanilla servers along with Lotus being one
>>             of the first largest TF2 communities who is still alive.
>>
>>             You have to be understanding and give every community
>>             member credit and a pat on the back for their hard work.
>>             If it weren't for them, a lot of the TF2 population would
>>             be undecided in terms of their server preference.
>>
>>             The problem at hand:
>>             New players are uneducated or lazy about unchecking a box
>>             that might be irrelevant to them.
>>
>>             We cannot do much to fix it. By bickering and repeatedly
>>             complaining, Valve will not be interested in reading our
>>             comments. Let's keep our thoughts and ideas organized in a
>>             thread and make a kind request for Valve to tweak the
>>             change they have made.
>>
>>             Someone mentioned an excellent point here about being able
>>             to create a new quick play account to quickly regain
>>             traffic. That is correct. That is also however part of the
>>             problem. A server should be able to build a score and
>>             reputation upon how long its been up. New servers should
>>             not get the same advantage as the servers that have been
>>             up for months or years.
>>
>>             It is not the community's fault that Valve is making this
>>             change. The problem is the fact that Valve doesn't care
>>             much or supports about user made communities. If they do
>>             not want to aid us, we will have to help ourselves. There
>>             are a lot of communities who relied on quick play and
>>             quick play ALONE to fill their servers. That whole idea is
>>             wrong and biased towards communities that work really hard
>>             to organize giveaways, contests, make their own plugins to
>>             enhance the user experience.
>>
>>             Valve - we understand you would like to keep a controlled
>>             population of TF2 going to your vanilla no plugins, no ad
>>             mins servers. Either you should remove all non valve
>>             servers from quick play and give all server ops the fair
>>             advantage or not pool us in the same system as your
>>             official servers and get rid of them or completely remove
>>             them from quick play.
>>
>>             The idea of Valve servers are nice, but they seem to be
>>             the culprit of all problems.
>>
>>             I kindly request a Valve employee to please provide some
>>             feedback and let us know if you are thinking about making
>>             any changes or keeping it then way it is.
>>
>>             If you don't plan on making any changes, then please: we
>>             kindly request you to add another check box saying
>>             "Community Servers" and keep it unchecked by default -
>>             that shall make you happy and give users some insight and
>>             choice as well.
>>
>>             Thanks for reading.
>>
>>             _______________________________________________
>>             To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the
>>             list archives, please visit:
>>             https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>>
>>
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
>>         archives, please visit:
>>         https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
>>     archives, please visit:
>>     https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
>> please visit:
>> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds

Reply via email to