What's being returned instead of the fallback? Is that configured somewhere for Hibernate to use that? Like a testing hibernate.properties?
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 12:03 PM Scott Marlow <smar...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 9/21/18 10:29 AM, Steve Ebersole wrote: > > Honestly Scott, I am thoroughly confused now as to what you are wanting > > and what you are reporting. > > > > Your last code fragment[1] is close. As I said earlier, building a > > SessionFactory typically involves individual service registries being > > used for each SF. You have to go out of your way for that to not be the > > case. I am pretty sure WF does not do this "going out of its way". So > > not sure why the test does. To me either: > > > > 1. write a unit test for StandardServiceRegistry(/Builder) > > 2. write a functional test for how building a SessionFactory handles > > StandardServiceRegistry. > > > > Instead you kind of do both and therefor do neither. > > > > I created a fork of your gist that shows a better test using (2), which > > I think is more what you are wondering about. It is "better" imo > > because I *think* it better represents what you do in WF/Jipijapa - > > https://gist.github.com/sebersole/d93a28b1dcf16f6f7eb823b7341a9097 > > Thanks, this helps! > > I pushed updates to > https://github.com/scottmarlow/hibernate-orm/commits/ServiceContributorTest > and squashed my commits. > > The good news is that MyRegionFactoryInitiator#resolveRegionFactory + > MyRegionFactoryInitiator#contribute are being called. :) > > I'm not sure why MyRegionFactoryInitiator#fallback doesn't get called. > > I commented out the RegionFactory lookup/testing, to resolve compile > errors. > > > > > > > [1] https://gist.github.com/scottmarlow/63241549820243923aab16e664c3c6c3 > > > _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
