I've added an issue for backporting HHH-6855. I thought it was a good idea to include HHH-6854 so that the backport for HHH-6855 would be tested.
Let me know what you decide about HHH-4358. Thanks, Gail ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Steve Ebersole" <st...@hibernate.org> > To: "Gail Badner" <gbad...@redhat.com> > Cc: "Hibernate" <hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org> > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 6:09:47 PM > Subject: Re: [hibernate-dev] Backports for 3.6.10 > > Actually it is not fixed yet :) Let me think about it. > > On Thu 19 Jan 2012 08:08:56 PM CST, Steve Ebersole wrote: > > I think HHH-6855 should be. HHH-6854 is just a test fix, I'd say > > its > > not important for backport. > > > > I don't think there is actually any code changes for HHH-4358. I > > may > > have left that fix version there by mistake. > > > > On Thu 19 Jan 2012 04:05:46 PM CST, Gail Badner wrote: > >> I've created new issues for backporting fixes for 3.6.10. > >> > >> Please take a look at: > >> https://hibernate.onjira.com/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&jqlQuery=fixVersion+%3D+%223.6.10%22+AND+project+%3D+HHH > >> > >> > >> I'm not planning to backport dialect-related issues, although I > >> could > >> be talked into it. > >> > >> Steve, should HHH-6855/HHH-6854 and/or HHH-4358 also be > >> backported? > >> > >> Adam, are there any Envers issues that should be backported for > >> 3.6.10? If so, please create new issues for them and assign as > >> appropriate. > >> > >> Feedback? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Gail > >> _______________________________________________ > >> hibernate-dev mailing list > >> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev > > > > -- > st...@hibernate.org > http://hibernate.org > _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
