Actually it is not fixed yet :) Let me think about it. On Thu 19 Jan 2012 08:08:56 PM CST, Steve Ebersole wrote: > I think HHH-6855 should be. HHH-6854 is just a test fix, I'd say its > not important for backport. > > I don't think there is actually any code changes for HHH-4358. I may > have left that fix version there by mistake. > > On Thu 19 Jan 2012 04:05:46 PM CST, Gail Badner wrote: >> I've created new issues for backporting fixes for 3.6.10. >> >> Please take a look at: >> https://hibernate.onjira.com/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&jqlQuery=fixVersion+%3D+%223.6.10%22+AND+project+%3D+HHH >> >> >> >> I'm not planning to backport dialect-related issues, although I could >> be talked into it. >> >> Steve, should HHH-6855/HHH-6854 and/or HHH-4358 also be backported? >> >> Adam, are there any Envers issues that should be backported for >> 3.6.10? If so, please create new issues for them and assign as >> appropriate. >> >> Feedback? >> >> Thanks, >> Gail >> _______________________________________________ >> hibernate-dev mailing list >> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev >
-- st...@hibernate.org http://hibernate.org _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
