Ok, I am totally confused then. I thought this was a discussion about BasicLogger. But we have been using that afaik way before our recent upgrade to 3.1
On Wed 09 Nov 2011 08:23:33 AM CST, David M. Lloyd wrote: > On 11/09/2011 08:22 AM, Hardy Ferentschik wrote: >> On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 15:00:07 +0100, Steve Ebersole <st...@hibernate.org> >> wrote: >> >>> Maybe instead of "shading in" the removed class you could just add it >>> back to the JBoss Logging codebase? >> >> Right, why can we not do that? > > You have it backwards. We didn't *remove* a class, we *added* one - > which makes it not present in 3.0.x. > >>> On 11/09/2011 04:48 AM, Emmanuel Bernard wrote: >>>> I see a few outputs >>>> >>>> - JBoss Logging 3.1.0.Final is released in the next 24h and we use it >>>> in Core and Search >> >> What's stopping a 3.1.0.Final release? > > Trying to resolve this issue for you guys. > > -- st...@hibernate.org http://hibernate.org _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
