On Aug 30, 2011, at 11:40 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> Yes I understood that was your suggestions; but I think that using
> @IndexEmbedded(depth=0, {IndexPath1, IndexPath2})
> would get you exactly what you wanted?
Ahh gotcha. I misunderstood. Yes that works for me.
>
> Just that I can still use for example depth=1 combined with some paths
> to mean "all of depth 1, plus these extra paths we hand-picked".
Putting what you said(which I agree with) into example form:
@IndexEmbedded(depth=3, paths={"a.b.c.d.e"})
Would index everything up to depth 3. Additionally index a.b.c.d.e, which
exceeds depth of 3.
> This flexibility seems handy to me, and makes the two features
> compatible (not conflicting in any meaning), to the point that IMHO
> they don't need new annotations.
Yeah this is much better. Thanks for clarifying.
ZK
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
