On Aug 25, 2011, at 9:31 AM, Hardy Ferentschik wrote: > It still conflicts with the actual default value of depth and that there is > no explicit way to say that it is ignored. I don't think "it seems clear" > is a good enough reason.
That's reasonable. If everything is left in IndexEmbedded you are right that it is basically mixing two different approaches into one annotation. The only other option I could think of is having an autoConfig attribute vs. an explicitConfig on IndexEmbedded. But that would require depth be moved into an 'autoConfig' annotation, which would not be desirable. > Yes, one of these alternatives. Maybe the "one new 'exclude' attribute in > IndexEmbedded and one new annotation for IndexSubPaths" That seems like the best fit, at the moment, as it eliminates any ambiguity. Zach _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
