On 28 sept. 2010, at 17:53, Emmanuel Bernard wrote: > > On 28 sept. 2010, at 16:21, Steve Ebersole wrote: >> >> >> 1) whether to combine read/write into one annotation : +1 from me, *so >> long as* neither is required. And as we discussed, ideally the column >> name would be optional too for single-column values. > > I've made the change. We are left with the naming challenge. I'll change and > push the new name tomorrow so there is still some time for flips. >
I've settled for @ColumnTransformer for a couple of reasons: - there is transformation to and from the column - there are similarities with the ResultTransformer functionally speaking (except ResultTransformer is read only and at the VM level) - the Column prefix encompasses both the fact that it's SQL and targetting the column - it's just a damn name Emmanuel _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
