> Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 16:13:35 +0100 > From: pertu...@free.fr > Cc: gavinsmith0...@gmail.com, ar...@aarsen.me, help-texinfo@gnu.org > > On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 04:49:11PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Here are my interrogations. First I have three questions about removed > > > HTML in the that look suspicious to me. I think that it should be > > > checked if this is intended, my wild guess is that it is not: > > > 1) the Copyright notice in comments at the very beginning is removed. > > > > Is it important? > > I think so, it is purposely done that way, I believe, and matches with > the '(maintain)Copyright Notices' node information:
The copyright is stated elsewhere anyway, so this is not relevant. > > > 2) the <link href=... rel=... > in <head> are removed, for example > > > <link href="#Top" rel="start" title="top"> > > > <link href="#Starting-Rules" rel="next" title="Starting Rules"> > > > > Look at how the produced HTML looks vs the one on the site: those > > links are the "Short TOC", which is completely redundant for reading > > the manual on-line. > > I do not understand that response. Those links are usually not directly > visible, they are not links appearing directly in the document text, > they are informations on the page that can be used or not by the > browsers: Then maybe I don't understand what we are talking about. > > > The other main interrogation is about the manual-html-fix-index-1, > > > manual-html-fix-index-2 defun and closing </div> code in manual-html-mono > > > manual-html-node. Most of these codes seems to do nothing nowadays, > > > except for one thing, adding, right after <body ...> an > > > <div id="content" class="inner"> > > > and adding matching </div>. The matching </div> is at the very end of the > > > file for the mono manual, and right before the table of contents > > > in the node split index.html file. It is not clear to me what this div > > > is used for. > > > > Sorry, I don't know. > > Can it be omitted? I don't want to make changes whose meaning I don't understand. I trust people who came before me and wrote this code that they were solving real problems. As long as the results are not obviously incorrect, I'd rather not change this.