On 2026-02-24 13:35, Eduardo Mercovich wrote:
> Dear fellow guixers.
> 
> First of all, congratulations with much gratitude for all the work poured on 
> this new release. It shows and it shines. :)

Guix is gorgeous!

> 
> I installed guix 1.5 on an 8 year old Dell Latitude starting with a small USB 
> drive and booting from it, using Spanish as language and everything went very 
> well. This machine has -sadly- some hardware that includes proprietary blobs, 
> but this is the machine I have now and those issues are off-list.

I didn't bother with 'nonguix' or w/e for this install to a Lenovo
desktop box. I'm certain something in it "needs" non-free firmware, but
I have not observed anything missing in its operation.
 
> 
> 
> 5. Contrasting with the previous, this last point is really a very small one. 
> The desktop environments chosen to be installed were Mate (just a simple one 
> to start if in trouble), i3 (the one I use) and exwm (with the hope to try 
> it). Mate didn't include by default any web browser. I'd like to argue that 
> since it is such a common and fundamental tool for most people these days (we 
> can debate if this is good and/or desirable), if it is within our reach by 
> default we should provide one. Anyone would do, no matter how simple.
> 

In my opinion, The GNU System should, at minimum, provide emacs
out-of-the-box. Emacs can browse the web, and its lack of javascript
support suggests that it is probably safe enough to use on the web even
if its version is a little stale... which it would not be, because guix.

It is also a tool many GNUsers rely upon, and arguably the "best" tool
available in GNU for editing Guile code. Guix makes you do that a lot...

I don't like to advocate for emacs, because I kind of hate it. I use it
increasingly, because it does everything (albeit poorly) and it isn't a
Mozilla project like the other do-everything tool I hate. I will admit
that emacs sometimes improves in ways that seem impossible with its 50+
years of tech debt, and that it does more with less than Firefox* does,
at lower cost.

* dont use firefox ugh. librewolf is less bad & supports sync; icecat is
probably better? but does not support sync

Reply via email to